| Home | Register | FAQ | Forums | Galleries | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Official Bremont Watch Forum Bremont Forum for the discussion of the Bremont Pilot watch range and the exploration of a British watch brand. - Moderator #Noodlefish |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Without wanting to get drawn into the "who carries out more modifications on their ETA movements" discussion, do remember that it took IWC the best part of two decades to move from simply buying in ETA movements to actually doing enough to them to be considered in-house. It took them 138 years to build their own chrono movement.
__________________
Your bleeding-edge Now is always someone else’s past. Someone else’s ’70s bellbottoms. Grasp that and start to attain atemporality. the #watchnerd |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Personally, Bremont should be applauded for going the route they are doing, and let's not forget that the current IWC movements based on the 2892 and 7750 are modified by ETA to IWC specs; there are exceptions, but that's deemed sufficient. Having the manufacture of watches within the UK is a huge deal if you're British, many brands play on their British 'heritage' without actually looking to move production over here, at all ends of the spectrum. Therefore, to me it's no gimmick at all, especially given that the brothers are moving the entire case production over here, rather than merely the finishing at present and bring all production over here as well. Would you seriously be willing to pay the premium that IWC charge on their 'in-house' movements compared to the ones derived from the 2892 and 7750 if Bremont went down that route? What would it actually prove? |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
I care about who might put my watch together; be it Stuart, Dave or any of the other guys at Bremont HQ that work very hard to get those watches out.... Then you have the service people, the marketing people ... events, sales, stock control, designers, they all have passion for the company, which I think enriches the brand and the designs of new watches.
What you get is a watch which is higher is quality ( parts and build ) than the majority of other 'luxury' brands I have seen ; added to that I like the fact the watches are not your average Breitling or sheep-clone Panerai guys you see in the city. I'm personally not interested in in-house, most people know its a way of controlling service, parts etc... okay if you're developing a complication....fair enough...But an in-house MBIIfor 7k or ETA version for 3k... I know what I would choose. When Bremont ( and I say 'when') go in-house, it'll be brilliant... but having only been going 5 years I'm happiest knowing Dave, Stuart & co are working tirelessly on building quality watches that are up there with the best, and lets face it they are the friendliest, most hard working watch company around at the mo. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
I really like that the brothers are moving production assembly to England. I think it is fantastic.
But just like other brands based all over the world (but outside or Switzerland) like to have Swiss Made printed on their dial (even though the only Swiss part of the watch is because they use ETA movement) I think Bremont will be truly be London made when that very important piece, the movement, is also being made in London (or England). I also assume that in order to have the London print they need to meet minimal requirements just like other brands using Swiss Made. So they certainly deserve to have it printed there that's not what I'm saying. It is kind of unique as many would probably prefer to have a Swiss Made watch then a London one. So I admire their desire to make it British (and unique). But as I said, I don't care if my Bremont has either/or (Swiss or London). I just enjoy them for what they are. Awesome looking, well made, great value watches with probably the best aftersales service in the industry. ![]() To answer the question, if Bremont modified themselves their ETA movements and would disclose the full extent of their in-house done in England modifications and that the improvements were noticeable (like IWC does) well then I (and many others I'm sure) would certainly acknowledge that they are up there with the best. For sure then I would't see the London as a marketing strategy. But I'd certainly like to see a Bremont watch made in London from A to Z, though I doubt I could afford it.
__________________
Ball Fireman Racer |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
IWC switched case production to China many moons ago and saved more than 90% costs, that's where all of those new models came from and the dough to make the new movements... that's what I heard..?
Don't get me wrong, I like loads of IWC, in fact after Bremont they have more models I like than anyone else... but there is plenty of room for other companies....
__________________
info@atgvintagewatches.com Call: +44 (0) 203 544 4012 Skype ATG Vintage Watches Join me On Facebook |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Good point. The cost of making a watch entirely in England is certainly much higher.
In the guitar world the same guitar made in USA is many times higher! I hope for IWC that the move pays because many companies have had problems with manufacturing in China.
__________________
Ball Fireman Racer |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
The most valuable Bremont is, and will always be, the gray Globemaster with red hands, #021. Not that I'm biased or anything...
__________________
TexZan 2011 C-17 Globemaster, gray face with red hands, #021 |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|